ICT SERVICES MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/20389/2021 · 2026-04-21
K S Hemalekha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7993 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7993 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21405 WP No. 20389 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 20389 OF 2021 (GM-KEB)
BETWEEN:
ICT SERVICES MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.30-A, PEENYA 2ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, PEENYA, BENGALURU - 560 058.
(REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AISVARYA CHANDRAN.,ADVOCATE FOR;
SRI. SHRIDHAR PRABHU.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ROOM NO.602, 6TH FLOOR, MS BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
2.
KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NO.16 C-1, MILLERS TANK BED AREA, VASANTH NAGAR
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21405 WP No. 20389 of 2021
BENGALURU - 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3.
BANGALORE ELECTRICTY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED K R CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 001.
(REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR)
4.
THE ASSISTNAT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NO.5 SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM, PEENYA SRS, BENGALURU - 560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH RAYAPPA.,AGA FOR R1;
SRI. B N PRAKASH.,ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. SHAHBAAZ HUSSAIN.,ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 8 NOVEMBER, 2021 ISSUED BY THE R4 PRODUCED HEREIN AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER The memorandum of settlement entered into between the petitioner and respondent Nos.3 and 4 under Section 89 of CPC read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005 has been received by this Court, which reads as under:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21405 WP No. 20389 of 2021
"I. The Petitioner sought for a writ of Certiorari or any other writ for order or direction to quash the demand notice bearing No.()- 5////2464-66 and to quash order dated: 29.10.2021 passed by the 4th respondent in complaint No.02/2019 and to quash order bearing Νο.ΑΕΕ(ΕΙ)/N5/SA/IA_BBC/175 dated: 15.04.2019 and other orders. II. Both the parties have participated in mediation on 28.01.2026, 05.02.2026, 12.02.2026, 26.02.2026 and 05.03.2026 they have agreed to settle their matter by drawing an agreement with following terms and conditions: a) The petitioner has agreed to pay the entire bill amount of Rs.1,70,96,979 (Rupees One Crore Seventy Lakhs Ninety-Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventy Nine Only) (principal BBC- Rs.1,12,42,174/- (Rupees One Crore Twelve Lakhs Forty Two Thousand One Hundred and Seventy Four Only) and 50% of the approved interest amount to Rs.58,54,805/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Five Only) outstanding against RRNO: N4HT-818 HT installation at Ms ICT Service Management Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. as full and final settlement of the claims of the 2nd respondent. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21405 WP No. 20389 of 2021
b) Accordingly the petitioner states that they have already paid the bill amount of Rs.1,70,96,979 (Rupees One Crore Seventy Lakhs Ninety-Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventy Nine Only) as full and final settlement vide UTR No.CITIN26649352220 dated:
07.04.2026. The respondent acknowledges the receipt of the said payments. c) Both the parties agreed that there are no other claims against each other apart from what is agreed above, on the basis of the orders challenged before this Hon'ble Court in the above W.P.20389/2024. III. That the Parties submit that, in view of the aforesaid terms of settlement arrived at between them the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders disposing of the writ petition as settled."
2. The said memorandum of settlement is taken on record. 3.
The authorized signatory of the petitioner - Vinay Joseph and the Assistant Executive Engineer - Rajesh Kumar, representing respondent Nos.3 and 4 are present
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21405 WP No. 20389 of 2021
before this Court and confirmed the settlement arrived at through Mediation. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of memorandum of settlement. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7