Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7992 (UTT)

MOHD ADNAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/980/2026 · 2026-07-13

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010091012026 2026:UHC:5728 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/980/2026 Mohd Adnan --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Jai Prakash Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 5. No order as to costs. (Alok Mahra, J.) 13-07-2026 mamta