Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 79917 (MAD)

S.SARAVANAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/49644/2025 · 2026-01-02

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.49644 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.01.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.49644 of 2025 S.Saravanan S/o.Santhanam, Ariyavanniyar Street, Thagattur, Subramanyakadu, Tagattur, Vedharanyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District 614714 Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Nagapattinam District. 2.The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Department, Vennaru Basin Sub-Division, Tiruvarur District. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Vennaru Basin Sub-Division-1, Tiruvarur District. ______________ p. 2 W.P.No.49644 of 2025 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagapattinam District. 5.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Vedharanyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take immediate action to replace the three old motors at Thagattur Electric irrigation facility situated at Thagattur, Vedharanyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District and remove or desilt and deepen the 14 Water channels based on the petitioner representation dated 22.10.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.Shanmugasundaram for Mr.R.Muruga Bharathi For Respondents: Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Through this public interest litigation, voice of farmers is ______________ p. 3 W.P.No.49644 of 2025 sought to be raised highlighting that the old electric motors, which were installed over 73 years ago, are unable to draw sufficient water for the purposes of irrigation. 3. The additional grievance is that proper steps towards strengthening of bund and desilting have also not been taken, though assured earlier. 4. In response, learned State counsel has placed for perusal of the Court G.O.(2D) No.19, Water Resources (S1) Department, dated 4.7.2025, which deals with the aforesaid aspect. Learned State counsel submits that once the decision has been taken by the Water Resources Department, the grievance would be redressed by replacing two old electric motors as early as possible and, in any case, within a period of six months. He also submits that other steps required to be taken towards desilting and strengthening of bund shall be undertaken and completed as early as possible so as to ensure proper supply of water for the purposes of irrigation of over 1200 acres of land. 5. Placing on record the aforesaid statement made, the writ ______________ p. 4 W.P.No.49644 of 2025 petition, at this stage, is disposed of with a direction that necessary steps, as stated in G.O.(2D) No.19, dated 4.7.2025, shall be taken within a reasonable period and, in any case, within a period of six months. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 02.01.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Nagapattinam District. 2.The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Department, Vennaru Basin Sub-Division, Tiruvarur District. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Vennaru Basin Sub-Division-1, Tiruvarur District. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagapattinam District. 5.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Vedharanyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ______________ p. 5 W.P.No.49644 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No.49644 of 2025 02.01.2026 ______________