CONT P No. 294 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CONT P No. 294 of 2026 Magudapathy S/o.Nanjappan, D.No.2/115, Kothamangalam Village And Post, Paramathi Velur Taluk, Nanjappagoundampalayam, Namakkal District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Durgamoorthi and 4 others The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal District 2. M.G.Saravanan The District Revenue Officer Namakkal Distirct, Namakkal District Collectorate, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal 3. P.S.Levin The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruchendgode Taluk, Paramathi Velur Mai Road, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District 4. M.Govindaswamy The Tahsildar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 294 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakal District 5. Pramalatha The Revenue Inspector Jedarpalayam, Paramthi Velur Tlauk, Namakkal District ..Contemnor(s) Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act o punish the respondents for his willful and wanton disobedience of order in W.P.No.19350 of 2025 dated 28.05.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M. Elango For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Ramanlaal Additional Advocate General for Mr.T.K.SARAVANAN ADDL GOVT PLEADER ORDER When the matter is taken up today, the learned Additional Advocate General submitted that as per the Order passed by this Court in W.P.No.19350 of 2025 dated 28.05.2025, the first respondent considered the representation of the petitioner and passed a detailed Order on 04.08.2025 and rejected the representation of the petitioner stating that already patta was issued in favour of one Gunavathi, wife of the petitioner and reconveyance of alternative pathway https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 294 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 sought by the petitioner is not permissible. He further submitted that as against Order of the first respondent, the petitioner has already preferred a revision by the petitioner. A copy of the Order passed by the first respondent has been filed before this Court. 2. As per the direction of this Court, since the representation of the petitioner has already been closed, there is no contempt. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Advocate General, this Contempt Petition is closed. 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 294 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. vrc CONT P No. 294 of 2026 13-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis