Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010048562026 2026:GAU-AS:8374 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./48/2026 SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT NARAJ BY RUSTOMJEE, 101, JUNCTION OF MV ROAD AND WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI 400069 ITS REGIONAL OFFICE 4TH FLOOR, B BLOCK APEEJAY HOUSE 15, PARK STREET, KOLKATA 700016 WEST BENGAL AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, LAKSHMI DARSHAN, OPPOSITE BORA SERVICE STATION, ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI 781007 REPRESENTED BY ITS SE. EXECUTIVE LITIGATION AND TP VERSUS SAZIA AHMED AND 4 ORS WIFE OF LATE ASRAF ALI 2:SAHIL MOHAMMAD HABIB SON OF LATE ASRAF ALI 3:SYEDA JULEKHA KHANAM DAUGHTER OF LATE ASRAF ALI ALL ARE THE R/O- HATIPOTA PART-II POLICE STATION -BILASHIPARA DISTRICT - DHUBRI ASSAM. PRESENT R/O- BALAPARA DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM RESPONDENT NO. 3 BEING MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 4:ABDUL BATEN AHMED SON OF SUKUR ALI AHMED Page No.# 2/3 RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMAYERCHAR PART-II POST OFFICENAYERALGA POLICE STATION- BILASHIPARA DISTRICT - DHUBRI ASSAM PIN CODE783348 OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. AS-01-EN-8881 BALENO 5:ISMAIL HUSSAIN SON OF LATE USAF HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGEANANDANAGAR POLICE STATION- BILASIPARA DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN CODE-783348 ASSAM DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. AS-01- EN-8881 BALENO Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T KALITA, MR. A KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M KHAN (Res. 1 to 3), MR. R. AHMED (Res. 1 to 3),MS J AKTAR (Res. 1 to 3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 12.06.2026 Heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. By way of the present review petition, the petitioner seeks review/modification of the order dated 11.02.2026 to the limited extent that, upon deposit of 50% of the awarded amount before the Registry of this Court, the claimant, while seeking release of the deposited amount, be required to furnish an indemnity bond. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the claimant, fairly submits that he has no objection to such a condition being incorporated in the order dated 11.02.2026. In view of the consensus at the Bar, the last paragraph of the operative portion of the order dated 11.02.2026 stands modified and shall be read as follows: “Upon such deposit being made, the claimant shall be at liberty to approach the Registry of this Court by filing an appropriate application seeking release of the deposited amount, accompanied by an indemnity bond. Upon such application being filed, and after due verification of the identity and entitlement of the claimant, the Registry shall, in accordance with law, release the deposited amount to the claimant upon obtaining proper acknowledgment.” The order dated 11.02.2026 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. This order shall form an integral part of the order dated 11.02.2026. The review petition accordingly stands allowed to the extent indicated above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant