Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7982 (JHR)

AJAY TURI @ AJAY KUMAR TURI @ AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3332/2026 · 2026-05-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3332 of 2026 1. Ajay Turi @ Ajay Kumar Turi @ Ajay Kumar aged about 26 years, S/o Jahal Turi 2. Sachin Turi aged about 18 years, S/o Gopal Turi Both R/o vill Lokay, P.O. Lokay, P.S. Lokainayanpur, District-Giridih (Jharkhand) … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioners: :Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate For the State :Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. --------- 03 /Dated: 01.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have committed dacoity and looted cash of Rs. 1,55,000/- from the pocket of the informant and also looted the motorcycle. It is also submitted that the petitioners are not named in the FIR yet they have not been put on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit dated 22.04.2026. It is next submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 20.02.2026 as mentioned at para 11 of the bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioners may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridh in connection with Tisri P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and they undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner, during the pendency of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.05.2026 Uploaded: 04.05.2026 MM /Cp.03