M/s.Clan Laboratories Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST)
WP/50337/2025 · 2026-01-05
C Saravanan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 79806 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 79806 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.50337 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.01.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.50337 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.56344 of 2025 M/s. Clan Laboratories Private Limited Rep. By its Director Mr. Jaganathan Jayaseelan, S/o.M.Jaganathan, 5/5A, 3rd Cross Street, Pudupakkam, SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri, Tamil Nadu – 603 103.
GSTIN : 33AABCO0958K1ZE. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Commercial Tax Office, 26, 2nd Floor, Abhirami Complex, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Kanchipuram Main Road, Thimmavaram, Chengalpattu – 603 101.
2. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Nandanam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 035.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, direction to first respondent herein to consider and process the application dated 07.10.2025 in FORM GST SPL-02 filed by ____________ Page No. 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.50337 of 2025 the petitioner for waiver of interest and penalty without reference to limitation, within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish For Respondents : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate
ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondents. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider and process the application dated 07.10.2025 filed by the petitioner in FORM GST SPL-02 for waiver of interest and penalty under Section 128A of the respective GST enactments without reference to limitation and within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. ____________ Page No. 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.50337 of 2025
4. The petitioner was a recipient of assessment earlier an order dated 26.04.2024 for the tax period 2018-2019. By the aforesaid assessment order, the demand confirmed against the petitioner is as follows:- S.No. Act Tax Interest Penalty Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 SGST 216809 217474 21681 455964 2 CGST 216809 217474 21681 455964 3 IGST 0 794969 0 794969 4 CESS 114280 114630 11428 240338 TOTAL 547898 1344547 54790 1947235
5. A reading of the assessment order dated 26.04.2024 indicates that the part of the demand may have to be dropped in view of statutory intervention by way of insertion of Section 16(5) and 16 (6) into the respective GST enactments vide SO 4253(E) with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (Act 15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024. 6. The remaining tax liability confirmed by the assessment order appear to pertain to availing of ineligible Input Tax Credit under Section 17(5) of the respective GST enactments. ____________ Page No. 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.50337 of 2025
7. The petitioner appears to have paid a sum of Rs.2,72,264/- on 18.10.2025 and 31.10.2025 towards the tax liability confirmed by the assessment order. However, the learned Government Advocate for the respondents is unable to confirm the same. 8. In view of the aforesaid statutory intervention by insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16 (6) into the respective GST Enactments vide SO 4253(E) with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024, the matter requires reconsideration. 9.
Accordingly, the assessment order dated 26.04.2024 is quashed and case is remitted back to the second Respondent to examine whether the petitioner was otherwise entitled to Input Tax Credit but for the belated availment of such Input Tax Credit for the relevant tax period. The second respondent shall thereafter pass appropriate orders on merits as expeditiously as possible. 10. Upon such orders being passed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to workout the remedy in the manner known to law in so far as the other issue. ____________ Page No. 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.50337 of 2025
11. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 05.01.2026 Neutral Citation : Yes / No av To:
1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Commercial Tax Office, 26, 2nd Floor, Abhirami Complex, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Kanchipuram Main Road, Thimmavaram, Chengalpattu – 603 101. 2. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Nandanam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 035. ____________ Page No. 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.50337 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. av W.P.No.50337 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.56344 of 2025 05.01.2026 ____________ Page No. 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis