[2026:RJ-JP:22136] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7391/2026 Rajkumar @ Raju S/o Chhitarmal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Jaysinghpura Shekhawatan, Police Station Harmada, Jaipur West At Present R/o Baniya Mohlla Daulatpura Bagwada Police Station Daulatpura, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 463/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Section 304(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that co-accused Vishnu Soni has already been enlarged on bail by the Sessions court vide order dated 04.01.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner was arrested on 20.12.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. [2026:RJ-JP:22136] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7391/2026] The charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court and the co-accused from whom recovery of stolen gold chain was effected has already been enlarged on bail, therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajkumar @ Raju S/o Chhitarmal, in connection with FIR No.463/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police [2026:RJ-JP:22136] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7391/2026] station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 93/ashu/416