IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.885 of 2026 Subas Chandra Singh …. Petitioner Ms. P. Naidu, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 19.02.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: - “The Petitioner therefore most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased (i) To admit this writ application and Issue notice to the Opposite parties (ii) And direct the 0pp. Party authorities to extend 3rd RACP benefits in favour of the petitioner on completion of 30 years of service by fixing his basic pay appropriately in the time scale of Rs.9,300/- to Rs.34,800/- with G.P. Rs.4800/- w.e.f. 01.01.2013 along with all consequential financial benefits including the revision of pay as per ORSP Rules 2017 so also pension p. 2 p. 2 within a time bound period for the interest of justice. (iii) And to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner under Annexure 2 in light of the judgement passed in W.P(C) no 8826 of 2021 disposed of on 30.03.2021. (iv) And be pleased to pass any other Writ(s), Direction(s), Order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may be deemed fit and proper.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-2 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev