Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 79797 (MAD)

K.SWAMINATHAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/50314/2025 · 2026-01-05

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 50314 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 50314 of 2025 1. K.Swaminathan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruvallur District, 1st Floor, Collectorate, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur-602 001 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruttani Division, Pattabiramapuram Lake, Erular Colony, Tiruttani-631209 3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Pattabiramapuram Lake, Erular Colony, Tiruttani-631 209 4.The Revenue Inspector Bharathiyar Street, Kamarajar Nagar, Tiruttani-631 209 5.J.Devi Respondent(s) PRAYER To direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conclude the enquiry in Na.Ka.No.2984/2022/A6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sanjay For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 To R4 R5 – Dispensed with https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50314 of 2025 ORDER This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a direction to the second and third respondents to conclude the enquiry in Na. Ka. No.2984/2022/A6 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner had given a representation, seeking for cancellation of patta standing in the name of the fifth respondent. Pursuant to the same, the second and third respondents have commenced enquiry proceedings in Na. Ka. No.2984/2022/A6. However, according to the petitioner, till date, no final orders have been passed on the petitioner’s representation. 3. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation is considered on merits and in accordance with law and final orders are passed thereafter by the second and third respondents within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50314 of 2025 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2022, which culminated in the enquiry proceedings viz., Na. Ka. No.2984/2022/A6 and to conclude the said enquiry proceedings viz., Na. Ka. No.2984/2022/A6 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the fifth respondent as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems fit to enquire. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 05-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Tiruvallur District, 1st Floor, Collectorate, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur-602 001 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruttani Division, Pattabiramapuram https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50314 of 2025 Lake, Erular Colony, Tiruttani-631209 3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Pattabiramapuram Lake, Erular Colony, Tiruttani-631 209 4.The Revenue Inspector Bharathiyar Street, Kamarajar Nagar, Tiruttani-631 209 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50314 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 50314 of 2025 05-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis