Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7978 (CHH)

SMT. KUNTI TIWARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1254/2026 · 2026-03-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12830 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1254 of 2026 • Smt. Kunti Tiwari W/o Late Shri Dhanesh Chandra Tiwari Aged About 67 Years R/o Ashok Nagar, Ekta Colony, Post And Thana- Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Engineering Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Engineer-In-Chief Public Health And Engineering Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Superintendent Engineer E/m Circle, Public Health And Engineering Department, Neer Bhawan, Civil Line, Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Executive Engineer E/m Division, Phe Department, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5. Director Treasury, Account And Pension Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6. Accountant General State Of Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Lav Sharma, Advocate For Respondents-State For Respondent No. 6 : : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Govt. Advocate Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 17/03 /2026 1. Learned State counsel submits that according to the reply submitted by the State, husband of petitioner died in harness on 03.11.1999 PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 while he was in service under the Government of Madhya Pradesh. She also submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved of non-payment of death-cum-retiral dues, petitioner has to approach before the other forum by way of filing appropriate proceeding. 2. Submission made by learned counsel for the State is not disputed by the counsel for petitioner with respect to date of death of husband of petitioner on 03.11.1999. On the said date, service of husband of petitioner is with the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh, cause of action arose in the State of Madhya Pradesh and therefore petitioner can file appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum impleading the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance. 3. In view of observation made above, this writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty with the petitioner to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. Sd/- sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn