PRIYANSHU GURJAR S/O KARAN SINGH GURJAR v. CHAIRMAN, UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSIONS (UGC)
CW/908/2026 · 2026-05-26
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7975 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7975 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 908/2026 Priyanshu Gurjar S/o Karan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 17 Years, (Minor) R/o P.no. 3, Bhaneshwari Vatika Vistar-D, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur Through His Father And Natural Guardian Karan Singh Gurjar S/o Bhagwan Sahay Aged 43 Years, R/o P. No. 3, Bhaneshwari Vatika Vistar-D, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Chairman, University Grants Commissions (Ugc), Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariate, Jaipur.
3. Jecrc University, Through Its Registrar, Jecrc University Campus Plot No.is-2036 To 2039, Ramchandrapura Industrial Area, Vidhani, Sitapura Extension, Jaipur -
303905. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Chechi with Mr. Sumit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka Mr. Sahil Jain Mr. Vishal Choudhary for Mr. Abhinav Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 26/05/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the respective parties have apprised this Court that the parties have adopted a mediated approach and have amicably resolved the underlying dispute inter se them.
2. The record and application qua the said mediation are taken on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:22363] (2 of 2) [CW-908/2026]
3. In light of the said amicable settlement, the lis involved in the present petition no longer survives.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, liberty is granted to either of the parties to move an appropriate application for the revival of the present petition if the factual position regarding the settlement is found to be otherwise.
5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J s-59/DEEPAK