- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6765 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 2. JAYALAXMI DAUGHTER OF SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YERS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 3. POOJAGOWDA W/O DHARANIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 4. MANASA W/O B N RAMESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 5. KAMALA D/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 6. BASAVARAJU S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 7. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YERS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 8. NARASIMHASWAMY S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 9. RAVISHANKAR @ RAVIKANTH S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 10. GANESHA S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 11. RAJESHA S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 12. SATHISHA S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 13. GIRISHA S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 14. CHETHAN S/O SINGRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.1817 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 ADARSHANAGAR, ADLIMANE ROAD HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 14 ARE REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER MANJUNATH. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JWALA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANASOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 3. ADDITIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 4. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS MYSORE DIVISION, MYSORE - 570 005. 5. PUTTAMMA WIFE OF VENKATEGOWDA, MAJOR RESIDENT OF UDDUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 6. HARISH SON OF RANGEGOWDA - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 MAJOR SIDENT OF UDDUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 7. RAVIKUMAR K.P. S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA MAJOR SIDENT OF UDDUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 8. JAYAKUMAR SON OF LAXMEGOWDA MAJOR SIDENT OF UDDUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1) SET ASIDE / QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17/03/2023 PASSED IN LNSJD.REVISION PETITION NO. 89/2022-23, BY THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS MYSORE DIVISION, MYSORE ANNEXURE-H AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10483 WP No. 6765 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 05.02.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply the office objections. Failing which, the matter shall be listed for dismissal on 19.02.2026." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1