Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7973 (CAL)

UMBARALI ALIAS UMBAR ALI SKEIKH ALIAS MO v. AMINUDDIN SHEIKH

SA/430/1968 · 2026-02-27

Arindam Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.02.2026 Court No.39 DL/Item No.-11 [Milan, A.R. (Ct)] In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side SA 430 of 1968 UMBARALI alias UMBAR ALI SHEIKH alias MO VS AMINUDDIN SHEIKH Despite direction for service of administrative notice neither the appellant nor has the respondent appeared before the Court when the matter was called on for several times. On perusal of the note given by the Department, it appears that the administrative notices were dispatched to the appellant and the respondent at their addresses as stated in the cause title of the second appeal. Neither the appellant nor the respondent has been found to be there in the address as indicated in the cause title. The undelivered packets containing the postal article dispatched to the appellant and the respondent have been returned back with an endorsement “Insufficient Address/Deceased”. The service attempted on the recorded advocates has also been fruitless for insufficient particulars. 2 In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, as no one has turned up either to represent the appellant or respondent, though the matter has been appearing in the list, the matter is dismissed considering the fact that with the passage of time no one is interested to either proceed or oppose the matter. Let the records of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court, if any, are lying in this Court, be returned to the appropriate Court with a copy of this order. (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)