30-WP-9633-2026 (C).odt Pallavi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9633 OF 2026 Kuldeep Dattatraya Suryavanshi ...Petitioner Versus Pune Municipal Corporation, Through Its Authorized Officer ...Respondent ... Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr. Manan Sharma, Piyush Sharma and Ms. Payal Sharma for Respondent No.6. Mr. Shashank Bhondave i/b. Manoj Kumar Mishra for the Respondent No.7 - IDFC Bank. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. We have heard Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh, learned counsel for the Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits at present, through an Application dated 4th November 2025 which is a Statutory Legal Notice under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, the Petitioner has ventilated his grievance. This in regard to road widening and physical demarcation of the same which is inconsistent with the larger layout comprising of private plot Nos.1 to 17. 2. Mr. Deshmukh would submit that the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 1 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2026.09.11 19:34:45 +0530 30-WP-9633-2026 (C).odt i.e. Pune Municipal Corporation have provided only front side of road widening. Private Plot No.9 belonging to Respondent No.6 has not provided any rear-side road widening. Further, the Petitioner’s plot bearing Nos.10A+10B have been provided both front and rear- side widening, whereas, private plot nos.11 to 17 have only provided front side road widening. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has contended that for the present purposes, the above aspects can be examined by the Municipal Corporation in accordance with law. Accordingly, he would submit that the reliefs sought in the Petition be confined to the Application/ Statutory Legal Notice dated 4th November 2025, which is stated to be pending consideration. This may be decided expeditiously. 4. Mr. Manan Sharma, learned counsel for Respondent No.6 and Mr. Shashank Bhondave, learned counsel for Respondent No.7 have appeared. They submit that once the matter is relegated to the Municipal Corporation which is constituted under the Pune Municipal Corporation, the relief as pressed before this Court, can be examined by the Corporation. However, the opportunity of hearing is to be extended to the respective parties. 5. Considering the factual situation as emerged, we are not inclined to advert the matter on merits. With the consent of the 2 30-WP-9633-2026 (C).odt parties, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of with an observation that the Application dated 4th November 2025 be decided on its merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of issuance of certified copy of this order. 6. Suffice to this, we have not adverted to the merits of the case. With the above observations and directions, the instant Writ Petition stands Disposed Of. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 3