ANIL KUMAR S/O SHRI PRAHLAD RAY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9639/2026 · 2026-05-26
Sudesh Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22374] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9639/2026
1. Anil Kumar S/o Shri Prahlad Ray, Aged About 42 Years, R/ o Mohalla Harijan, Ganv Napawali, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Napawali, District Sikar, Rajasthan
2. Anju Devi W/o Shri Vijayendra Kumar Swami, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 21, Mohalla Bhadang Ka, Chhawani, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Local Bodies, Government Of Rajasthan, C-Scheme, Near Civil Lines Railway Phatak, Jaipur
2. The Executive Officer, Nagar Palika- Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan
3. M/s Shri Shyam Services, Through Its Proprietor, Vpo- Kubara, Tehsil-Neemkathana, District Sikar, Rajasthan- 332713 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 26/05/2026
1. Indisputably, petitioners have already preferred S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11405/2025, which is pending.
2. In such view of the matter, with liberty to raise the grievance of petitioners as raised herein, in the pending writ petition, counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/145-S