D DEVA VIGINS PROPRIETOR OF MS v. INTERNATIONAL FILMS Vs M S CINEKORN ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD REP BY DICRETCTOR KALAPI NAGADA
C.S(COMM DIV)/340/2025 · 2026-01-05
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 79673 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 79673 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.340 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.S.(Comm.Div)No.340 of 2025 and O.A. No.1215 of 2025 D.Deva Vigins Proprietor of M/s.VS International Films, Door No.172, 2nd Floor, Raahat Plaza, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Chennai – 600 026. ... Plaintiff vs. M/s.Cinekorn Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director Mr.kalapi Nagada, No.103, 1st Floor, Ankita Building, Cross Road of Nehru Road & Dixit Road, Opp. Bharat Hindu Hotel, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai – 400 057. ... Defendant Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, 1956 r/w Sections 51, 53, 55 and 62 of The Copyright Act, 1957 and the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and Section 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 praying for a judgment and decree on the following terms: 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.340 of 2025 a. A Permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its men, agents, servants or persons acting on its behalf or claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff’s copyrights in respect of the cinematograph film mentioned in the schedule from exploiting the same through Youtube Channels, internet, theatres, world satellite television or any other media/medium or in any manner; b. for the costs of the suit. For Plaintiff : Mr.T.Pazhanivel
JUDGMENT On instructions, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he will withdraw the suit and initiate arbitration proceedings in terms of the arbitration clause in the Film Assignment Agreement dated 12.07.2023. He has made an endorsement to that effect. By taking note of the same, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected application is closed.
05.01.2026 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.340 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. mmi C.S(Comm.Div)No.340 of 2025 05.01.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis