[2026:RJ-JP:22018] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3657/2026 Kaluram S/o Teekaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Mui, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 33/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3) & 338 of BNS and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act and Section 13 of RPGO. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that it is alleged in the FIR that one complaint was registered against the petitioner, however, in the investigation, statement of complainant could not be recorded and in the charge-sheet, it is specifically mentioned that the concerned person attempted to contact with the complainant, however, they could not contact. It is also contended that the other allegation [2026:RJ-JP:22018] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3657/2026] against the petitioner is regarding online gambling, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned Court, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026, trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and more particularly the fact that statement of complainant has not been recorded so far and the petitioner was not traceable as indicated in the charge-sheet, the other allegation pertains to playing online gambling and not with regards to the commission of any cyber fraud, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kaluram S/ o Teekaram, in connection with FIR No. 33/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/24