Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:15822 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.490 of 2026
Decided on: 11th May, 2026
Dalip Singh
.......Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others.
...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr.Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 05.05.2026 and a copy of office order dated 18.04.2026 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. The same are taken on record.
2.
A perusal of office order dated 18.04.2026 reveals that the mandate contained in the judgment passed by this Court has been implemented, subject to final outcome of the curative petition filed by the Jal Shakti Vibhag in Balo Devi’s case as well as other legal remedy that may be pursued by the Government in relation to the judgments in Balo Devi, Sunder Singh and other similar cases. The concerned Drawing and
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2026:HHC:15822 ) 2
Disbursing Officer has been directed to submit the complete pension case of the petitioner, immediately to the office of the Principal Accountant General (A&E) Shimla, H.P., after making necessary entries in the service book of the individual, therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. However, it is made clear that in case benefits flowing out of the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi District Mandi, H.P. are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
3.
In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 11th May, 2026
Judge
(naveen)