IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27451 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- SHRI NAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Manoj Sah @ Manoj Kumar Son of Sikendra Sah Resident of Village- Mangarwara, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Srinagar, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pooja Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No.63 of 2025 instituted under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of five pellets each from the pocket of co-accused Sajan Kumar and co-accused Gautam Kumar. It is alleged that both the above co-accused have disclosed that petitioner called them and took them to the house of Bisho Sharma for purchase of pellets where said Bisho Sharma gave them 10 pellets in a dabba on payment of Rs.5,000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27451 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 case only on the basis of disclosure statement made by the co- accused. He further submits that the petitioner is said to be supplier of the said pellets but the petitioner has no concern either with the aforesaid co-accused persons or with the alleged seized pellets. Learned counsel submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. He further submits that except the disclosure statement of the co-accused, there is no material against the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a young boy, having got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as his clean antecedent and young age, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhepura/ concerned Court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27451 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 Case No.63 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T