Ms Galpha Laboratories Ltd v. Ms Marksans Pharma Limited
ARBP/422/2026 · 2026-09-02
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7956 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7956 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/2 ARBP-422-2026 (NOB-2).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 422 OF 2026
Ms. Galpha Laboratories Ltd. … Petitioner Vs. Ms. Marksans Pharma Limited … Respondent _______ Mr. H. S. Gupta i/b Mr. S. R. Gupta for Petitioner. Mr. Bhavya Ganatra i/b Corporate Attorneys for Respondent. _______
CORAM :
ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 7 th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.
1. Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.
2. Praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 2 nd September, 2026.
3.
Learned counsel for the Respondent points out that though the mandate of the Tribunal had been extended for a period of three months, the order incorrectly records the period as three weeks therefore, in paragraph no. 3, the word ‘three weeks’ be read as three months. Sairaj SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Digitally signed by SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Date: 2026.09.08 12:25:40 +0530
2/2 ARBP-422-2026 (NOB-2).DOC Furthermore, in paragraph no. 4, the word ‘counsels’ be read as learned counsel for the Respondent.
4.
Order dated 2 nd September, 2026 to be read accordingly.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Sairaj