Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7955 (JHR)

RANJIT PRASAD CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./387/2018 · 2026-05-01

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:12987 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 387 of 2018 1. Ranjit Prasad Choudhary aged 55 years son of late Judagi Lal Choudhary 2. Pushpa Devi aged about 51 years wife of Ranjit Prasad Choudhary Both resident of Road No. 3, Indrapuri, Ranchi under P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi, P.O. Hehal, Town and District Ranchi, Jharkhand PIN 834005 … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi, Office at Kutchery Road, Ranchi, under P.S. Kotwali, Post G.P.O. Ranchi, Town and District Ranchi, PIN 834001, Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, Office at New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, under P.S. Kotwali, Post G.P.O. Ranchi, Town and District, Ranchi, PIN 834001 4. The Special Officer, SAR Ranchi, Office at New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, under P.S. Kotwali, Post G.P.O. Ranchi, Town and District, Ranchi, PIN 834001, Jharkhand 5. The Circle Officer, Town Anchal, Office at New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, under P.S. Kotwali, Post G.P.O. Ranchi, Town and District, Ranchi, PIN 834001 6. Jagannath Munda (deleted) 6.(a) Mohan Munda 6(b) Vishnu Munda Both son of Late Jagannath Munda resident of village Hehal, Sarovar Nagar, P.O. Hehal, Police Sukhdeo Nagar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Ms. Akriti Shree, AC to AAG-II --- 13/01.05.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P. (C) No. 4944 of 2013 which stood dismissed on account of non-removal of defects in terms of order passed by the court. The learned counsel submits that on account of non-availability of certified copy of the documents, the defects could not be removed in time. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party-state is present. 4. Nobody has entered appearance on behalf of private respondents in spite of service of notice. ( 2026:JHHC:12987 ) 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and being satisfied with the cause shown, the time for removal of defects in W.P. (C) No. 4944 of 2013 is extended till 12.06.2026 failing which the writ petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the bench. 6. If the defects in the writ petition are removed within the extended time, office is directed to place the writ petition before appropriate Bench as per roster. 7. This CMP is disposed of. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Binit/ Dated: 10.05.206 Uploaded on 04.05.2026