Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7953 (GAU)

M/s T G Construction and M/s Lokam Yasi Carriage and Const (JV) v. The State of AP and 5 Ors

WP(C)/6/2026 · 2026-06-11

Kalyan Rai Surana

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000092026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/6/2026 M/s T G Construction and M/s Lokam Yasi Carriage and Const (JV) office address 6 Mile, NH 415 Road, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, represented by its authorized representative Shri Lokam Tassar. VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Circle Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PMGSY ARRDA RWD Itanagar Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 791111 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 Rural Works Division Laaying Yangte Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Er Bake Tachung Age: 0 Occupation : Junior Engineer RWD Laaying Yangte Division Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Sumit Chhetri, Tshering Yangzom Bhutia,Keten Tabang,Habung Aape,Tai Dool,Bamang Tatung,Risso Aking,Migo Laye Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Gimi Tarak,SC (RWD) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 12.06.2026 Ms. D. Riba, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submits that as the petitioner has got the desired relief, the matter has become infructuous. Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD and Ms. P. Pangu, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, are present. The matter stands closed, having become infructuous. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant