Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7950 (JHR)

MD FAHIM ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3237/2026 · 2026-05-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3237 of 2026 Md. Fahim Alam, age about 35 years, S/o Late Salim Alam, R/o Millat Nagar, Mahatopara Road, P.O. & P.S. Jugsalai, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioners: :Mr. Zubair Khan, Advocate For the State :Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P. --------- 03 /Dated: 01.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kadma P. S. Case no. 96 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted gold jewellery, watch and idols of God made up of gold and silver. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and without putting the petitioner on TIP, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 18.10.2025, as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamshedpur in connection with Kadma P. S. Case no. 96 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.05.2026 Uploaded: 04.05.2026 MM /Cp.03