Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7949 (UTT)

NANDI BAHUGUNA v. UNION OF INDIA

WPMS/3791/2025 · 2026-07-14

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010213822025 2026:UHC:5777 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3791/2025 Nandi Bahuguna and another --Petitioners Versus Union of India and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Piyush Tiwari, Standing Counsel for Union of India. 2. Petitioners have challenged the judgment and decree rendered by Civil Judge (Senior Division), New Tehri in Original Suit No. 35 of 2022. By the said judgment, petitioners’ suit seeking mandatory injunction was dismissed. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure. 4. Mr. Piyush Tiwari, appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection UKHC010213822025 2026:UHC:5777 if the writ petition is permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to approach appropriate forum. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.07.2026 Mahinder/