RAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA SON OF SHRI YADI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2592/2026 · 2026-05-26
Sudesh Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7949 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7949 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2592/2026 Rajendra Prasad Sharma Son Of Shri Yadi Ram, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 200, In Front Of Mandir, Barouli, District Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. District Education Officer, Elementary (Headquarters), Dholpur.
4. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Barauli, Panchayat Samiti, Kekri, District Dholpur.
5. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Barauli, Block Sar Mathura, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 26/05/2026
1. Petitioner was appointed as a School Assistant (Vidhyalay Sahayak) under the Rajasthan Contractual Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2022, and on account of filing of a charge-sheet against him in connection with FIR No.219/2025 registered at Police Station Saramthura for offences under Sections 74 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, his services have been dispensed with vide order dated 12.09.2025 by the Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Barauli,
[2026:RJ-JP:22271] (2 of 2) [CW-2592/2026] Saramthura, District Dholpur, whereagainst petitioner has preferred this writ petition.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR in question has been falsely lodged and there is likelihood of mutual settlement between the parties. Therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition at this stage, with liberty to file afresh in case the FIR/ charge-sheet is quashed by the Court.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, with the liberty as prayed for.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/17