RUPESH KUMAR PASWAN ALLIAS RUPESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3338/2026 · 2026-05-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7948 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7948 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3338 of 2026 Rupesh Kumar Paswan @ Rupesh Kumar aged about 31 years, S/o Mohan Paswan, Resident of Village-Chapra (Kolhatha), P.O. Barahat, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka, (Bihar) … … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … ... Opp. Party
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
--------- For the Petitioner: :Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State
:Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P.
--------- 03 /Dated: 01.05.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted cash of Rs. 72,010/- and wine of Rs. 1,54,340/- by breaking the lock of the shop. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet without putting him on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para 2 of the supplementary affidavit dated 22.04.2026, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is next submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2025 as mentioned in the said para 2 of the supplementary affidavit dated 22.04.2026 and co-accused has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.02.2026 in B.A. No. 11231 of
2025. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as
stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner, during the pendency of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.05.2026 Uploaded: 04.05.2026
MM /Cp.03