Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7947 (PNJ)

DHANNO & ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

RFA/4088/2010 · 2026-01-14

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-4088 136 (4) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Smt. Dhanno and others State of CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even date. 14.01.2026 sanjay 4088-2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 Smt. Dhanno and others Versus State of Haryana and anr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate for the appellants/landowners Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-2968 others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even 14.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-4088-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 …….Appellants Versus ..….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate /landowners. Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. 2968-2010, titled as Ram Mehar and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.20 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document