Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-4088 136 (4) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Smt. Dhanno and others State of
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even date. 14.01.2026 sanjay
4088-2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
***** RFA Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 Smt. Dhanno and others
Versus State of Haryana and anr.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate for the appellants/landowners Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana.
-.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-2968 others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even 14.01.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4088-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2026
…….Appellants Versus
..….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate /landowners. Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. 2968-2010, titled as Ram Mehar and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Yes/No
and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.20 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document