HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33256 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicant hands up supplementary affidavit annexing additional documents in support of bail application, is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Lucky Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 267 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 351(3), 191(3) of BNS, P.S.- Kerakat, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 29.06.2026 lodged by one of the injured Vikas Rajbhar with the allegation that there was some altercation between the injured informant and Dheeraj Yadav, later on seven named including the accused applicant and two anonymous persons had assaulted the informant. His father and uncle came to rescue him and they have also been assaulted. It is further contended that four injuries each were suffered by Vikas Rajbhar and Buddhiram Rajbhar. Three injuries suffered by Sudhiram, one is a gunshot injury. All the injuries are stated to be simple in nature in the medico legal examination report. The gunshot injury is assigned to the co-accused Dheeraj. The accused applicant has no specific role assigned in the present case. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has criminal history of two cases Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lucky Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) wherein he is on bail. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 04.07.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the nature and number of injuries and the role assigned to the accused applicant, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 18, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 33256 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad