Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7941 (CAL)

MOUMITA HALDER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1044/2026 · 2026-03-30

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

33 30.03. 2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 1044 of 2026 Moumita Halder Vs. State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Soumavo Mukherjee, Mr. Subhajit Seth. … for the petitioner. Mr. Ansar Mondal, Mr. Swapan Kumar Pal. … for the State. Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Ms. Pramiti Bandopadhyay, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh. … for the WBCSSC. Mr. Kunal Ganguly. … for the WBBSE. 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner is an unsuccessful candidate in the SLST-2025 examination. However, the petitioner was successful in the SLST-2016 examination. The petitioner has suffered a severe brain hemorrhage sometime in 2022 and seeks a consideration of her representation, which is appearing at page 35 of the instant writ petition, 3. Let such representation be considered by April 30, 2026. The resultant order of consideration be 2 communicated to the petitioner by May 15, 2026. 4. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the case nor such consideration will create any right in favour of the petitioner, which she otherwise does not have. 5. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)