Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 79401 (MAD)

A.TAMIZHVANAN v. THE SUB REGISTRAR

WP/47564/2025 · 2026-01-06

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.47564 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.47564 of 2025 A.Tamizhvanan .. Petitioner vs The Sub Registrar, Arakkonam. .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the refusal check slip dated 19.11.2025 in RFL/Arakkonam/47/2025 issued by the Sub Registrar, Arakkonam and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent the Sub Registrar, Arakkonam to register the sale deed dated 19.11.2025 in favour of the petitioner by his vendor within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Lakshmi Narasimhan For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47564 of 2025 ORDER Impugned refusal check slip dated 19.11.2025 is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land is classified as agricultural land and that the impugned order is untenable inasmuch as the refusal is on the ground that it is an unapproved house site. 3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader appears on behalf of the sole respondent. He submits that the petitioner may raise objections to the refusal check slip and that a speaking order would be issued under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. 4. The impugned order records “unapproved/not regularised house site”. No further particulars are contained in the said order. The petitioner asserts that it is agricultural land and does not form part of unapproved house site. Given the fact that the order does not record reasons for the conclusion therein, said order cannot be sustained and is set aside. As a consequence, the matter is remitted to the respondent for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a speaking order shall be issued within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47564 of 2025 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. 06.01.2026 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi To The Sub Registrar, Arakkonam. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47564 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. mmi W.P.No.47564 of 2025 06.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis