Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7940 (ORI)

SUBASH CHANDRA PRADHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/12246/2026 · 2026-05-02

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12246 of 2026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 02.05.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the present petition and issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why appropriate and effective steps have not been taken in the matter, and further be pleased to issue a writ/direction directing 0pp. Party No. 4 i.e., the Tahsildar, Bhograi, to forthwith conclude Demarcation Case No. 21 of 2025 within a time-bound period as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice; And pass any other order / orders, direction/directions for the better interest of justice, equity and good conscience; And for this act of your kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray”. 4. Considering the limited grievance, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Bhograi to dispose of the above mentioned demarcation case as early as possible, preferably Subash Chandra Pradhan .… Petitioner Represented by Mr. P.K. Dutta, Advocate -Versus- The Tahasildar Sadar, Cuttack .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. S.N. Patnaik, AGA Order No. 01. . within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by ensuring the attendance of all necessary parties. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Pravakar