C.M.P.No.847 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.M.P.No.847 of 2026 AND C.M.P.No.848 OF 2026, C.R.P.SR No.197567 of 2025, C.R.P.SR No.197568 of 2025 S.Nalina, W/o.T.Sundaramoorthy, 5/3, Milk Society Subramani Street, Suvalpet -631 001, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District. ... Appellant Vs. 1. Maryrajam Irudayaraj, W/o.Late J.D.Irudayaraj, Residing at 24/2, Somasundaram 6th Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai -600 023. 2.I.Immagulate Mary, D/o.Late J.D.Irudayaraj, Residing at 24/2, Somasundaram 6th Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai -600 023. 3.I.Victoria, D/o.late J.D.Irudayaraj, Residing at 24/2, Somasundaram 6th Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai -600 023. 4.T.R.Subramanian, S/o.T.S.Ramalinga Mudaliar, 1123, Gandhi Road, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District -631 209. J.D.Philamen Raj(Died) J.D.Xavier (Died) J.D.Vincent(Died) J.D.Josephine(Died) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.847 of 2026 5.J.D.Margret Mary, D/o.late J.Dyrianathan, M11/15, TNHB, Jothi Nagar, Arakkonam -631 003. Vellore District. 6.J.D.Alphonsa Mary, D/o.late J.Dyrianathan, M11/15, TNHB, Jothi Nagar, Arakkonam -631 003. Vellore District. ... Respondents CMP No. 848 of 2026 S.Nalina, W/o.T.Sundaramoorthy, 5/3, Milk Society Subramani Street, Suvalpet -631 001, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District. ... Petitioner Vs 1. J.D.Margret Mary, D/o.late J.Dyrianathan, M11/15, TNHB, Jothi Nagar, Arakkonam -631 003. Vellore District. 2.J.D.Alphonsa Mary, D/o.late J.Dyrianathan, M11/15, TNHB, Jothi Nagar, Arakkonam -631 003. Vellore District. 3.T.R.Subramanian, S/o.T.S.Ramalinga Mudaliar, 1123, Gandhi Road, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District -631 209. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Manoharan R.Renukadevi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.847 of 2026 COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.N.Manoharan, Learned Counsel for the petitioner in both cases. 2. In a suit for specific performance, the Court has granted a decree pursuant to which a sale deed came to be executed in favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, pursuant to the sale deed executed by the Court, the defendant in the suit for specific performance has filed an application to set aside the exparte decree, which was came to be allowed. In fact, an application to cancel the sale deed executed by the Court has also been allowed without notice to the petitioner. The petitioner has made out a prima facie case for being granted leave. 3. Accordingly, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered. 21-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No bsm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.847 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI, J. bsm CMP No. 847 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 848 OF 2026, CRP SR NO. 197567 OF 2025, CRP SR NO. 197568 OF 2025 21-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis