Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7934 (BOM)

ANIL MARUTI KAMBLE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/8488/2026 · 2026-09-02

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 908-WP-8488-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8488 OF 2026 ANIL MARUTI KAMBLE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Ramrao D. Biradar, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Uttam B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 And 6 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, learned advocate for petitioners, on written instructions from petitioner Nos.2 and 5, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to the extent of petitioner Nos.2 and 5. Copy of the written instructions is marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of identification. 2. Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn to the extent of petitioner Nos.2 and 5. 3. Grievance of the petitioners can be raised before the Divisional Commissioner in terms of clause 10 of the Government Resolution dated 18/05/2011. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the Divisional Commissioner. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2026:BHC-AUG:40146-DB