953ba954-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 954 OF 2026 Kiran Dnyanoba Devnale (Kharobe) VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Jadhav Satej S, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. K. K. Naik, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 2nd September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The present application is the second bail application. The change in circumstance is alleged to be long incarceration without any substantial progress in the trial. On the last occasion, taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the applicant, the report was called for from the trial court, which is received by this Court, wherein, the trial court has mentioned that two witnesses are already examined and one witness is awaiting cross examination for the reason that Muddemal property was not produced before the trial court. 2. The learned APP submits that he has instructed the investigating officer to submit Muddemal property at the earliest. He further submits that there are 8 to 10 witnesses which are to be examined in the present offence and therefore, prosecution need maximum 15 sessions to complete the trial. 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:40474 953ba954-26 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present application with a request to this Court that the statement of the learned APP be recorded that the trial may be concluded in 15 sessions. 4. Leave to withdraw the application is granted. The trial Court to make every possible endevarour to conclude the trial within a period of 15 sessions from today. In case no substantial progress is made, then, the applicant will be at liberty to prefer fresh bail application before the learned trial court, which, if filed, will be considered on its own merits. 5. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2