Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12993 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case(Civil) No. 118 of 2025
----
1. Bileshwar Manjhi, aged about 53 years, son of Late Chamu Manjhi, resident of Gola, Aorandih, Sangrampur, P.O Sangrampur, P.S Gola, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand
2. Huruwa Ray, aged about 54 years, son of Bhutu Ray, resident of Bada Dighi, P.O. & P.S. Bada Dihi, District Sahebganj, Jharkhand;
3. Binod Mahto, aged about 46 years, son of Ganesh Mahto, resident of House No.100, Ward No. 32, Karnibad, P.O. & P.S.-Karnibad, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand;
4. Surlal Manjhi, aged about 57 years, son of Ghasi Ram Manjhi, resident of No.87, Village Auradih, P.O & P.S. Aorandih, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand;
5. Shambhu Nath Ray, aged about 54 years, son of Khakhan Ray, resident of No. 16, Batani, Village-Batani, P.O & P.S. Badultola, District-Saran (Bihar);
6. Dip Narayan Pandit, aged about 52 years, son of Mishri Pandit, resident of Village Hisua, P.O. & P.S.-Hisua, District Nawada (Bihar);
7. Kurthi Mahto @ Kurni Mahto, aged about 54 years, son of resident Mogal Mahto, Village-SarlaKalan, P.O. Sangrampur, P.S. Gola, Barki Sarla, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand;
8. Laxman Mahto, aged about 57 years, son of Kalidas Mahto, resident of Mahudar, Kumhardagam, P.O. & P.S.-Gola, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand;
9. Birju Mahto, aged about 55 years, son of Kamal Nath Village-Sarlakalan, P.S.-Gola, Mahto, Sangrampur, Jharkhand; Sangrampur, P.O.-District- Ramgarh,
10. Mangar Mahto, aged about 59 years, son of Bodhan Mahto, resident of Sarla Kalan, Sangrampur, PO Sangrampur RS-Gola, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand
11. Munshi Tudu, aged about 59 years, son of Ganje Tudu, resident of Village- Saral Binda, PO-Kelabari, Kathalbari, PS.-Ranga, Sahebganj, Jharkhand; District-
12. Lakhan Malto, aged about 56 years, son of Late Surja Malto, resident of Village Budhi Basti, P.O.-Dighee, P.S. Ranga, District- Sahebganj, Jharkhand;
13. Nanamai Tudu, aged about 65 years, wife of Late Mistri Hembram, resident of Village-Banjhikendra, P.O.-Bara Dighee, P.S.-Ranga, District- Sahebganj, Jharkhand;
14. Dharo Hansda, aged about 58 years, son of Mangal Hansda, resident of Village-Khairbani, P.O.-Bara Dighee, P.S.- Ranga, District- Sahebganj, Jharkhand;
( 2026:JHHC:12993 )
15. Suria Pahariya @Surja Pakariya, aged about 54 years, son of Gangu Surya Pahariya, resident of Village-Simalgora, Dighee, P.O. Bakudih, Bara P.S. Ranga, District-Sahebganj, Jharkhand;
16. Balku Mahto, aged about 54 years, son of Bartu Mahto, resident of Village Mahto Tola, Near Hari Mandir, Gola, P.O. & P.S. Gola, -2- District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand. .......Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2.
Rahul Kumar Sinha, son of not known to the petitioners, Managing Director, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation, Unit of Government of Jharkhand, Khanij Nigam Limited, Nepal House Area, P.O& P.S-Doranda, District-Ranchi
.....Respondents
--- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Chandana Kumari, Advocate
: Mr. Kumar Swapnil, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Inderjeet Sinha, Advocate
: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, Advocate
: Mr. Ashutosh Aanand, AAG-III
--- 05/ Dated: 01.05.2026
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submit that the order has been complied. In response to the same, learned counsel for the petitioners does not object to the same and submit that the instant application may be disposed of, with the liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if so advised. Having regard to the rival submissions, the instant application stands disposed of, with liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Abha/- Date: 01.05.2026