[2026:RJ-JP:14491] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5164/2026 1. Irfan S/o Hidayat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Bhandara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Akram S/o Hidayat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Bhandara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 3. Mumtaj S/o Aasu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Gudavali, Police Station Utavad, District Palval (Haryana). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5002/2026 Vasim Akram Son Of Jamaluddin, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Sablana, Police Station Kama, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5003/2026 1. Altaf @ Altab Son Of Kayam, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Thalchana, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Moin Son Of Tahir, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Village Ahalwadi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent [2026:RJ-JP:14491] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5164/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bhavna Jat for Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Mr. Surendra Singh with Mr. Anoop Kumar for Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 08/04/2026 1. The present second bail applications have been filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 9/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2) (a) of BNS and Section 66-D of the IT Act. 2. The first bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, after filing of charge-sheet. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submit that FIR has been registered by the Police itself. Learned counsel further submits that apart from the petitioner Irfan, none of the petitioners has any criminal antecedents. As regards, petitioner Irfan, two cases are pending against him, however, they are not of similar nature. Learned counsel further submit that the petitioners are in custody since 06.01.2026; after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerably long time in its [2026:RJ-JP:14491] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5164/2026] conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners into custody, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail applications and submits that the said offences involve serious cyber fraud activity. He further submits that there is one complaint each against petitioners, namely Akram, Mumtaj, Vasim and Altaf and three complaints against petitioner Moin on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Hence, benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioners. 5. In response thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that all the complaints against the petitioners are false, moreover, in the complaints against petitioners, Akram, Mumtaj, Vasim, Altaf and Moin, meagre amount of Rs.49,803/-, Rs.6,050/-, Rs.1,000/-, Rs.9,879/-, Rs.40,165/- respectively, is involved. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed, petitioners are in custody since long and trial will considerably take long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Therefore, the instant second bail applications are allowed and the petitioners, namely (1) Irfan S/o Hidayat, (2) Akram S/o Hidayat, (3) Mumtaj S/o Aasu, (4) Vasim Akram S/o Jamaluddin, (5) Altaf @ Altab S/o Kayam and (6) Moin S/o Tahir, are ordered to be released on bail, provided, each of them [2026:RJ-JP:14491] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5164/2026] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 8. The petitioners are directed to mark their presence on 20th day of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the petitioners to the Trial Court on the same day of every month. 9. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move an application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /1-3