AYYAN KHAN KAISAR KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS UMARKHED
ABA/109/2026 · 2026-03-04
Shri M W Chandwani
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 792 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 792 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 60aba109.2026..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 109 OF 2026 (Ayyan Khan Kaisar Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra) ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. M.N. Ali, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.R. Rode, APP for non-applicant/State. Mr. Bhavin Suchak, Advocate (appointed) to represent non- applicant No.2 /Victim. CORAM : M.W. CHANDWANI, J. DATE : 04.03.2026. Heard the learned counsels for the respective parties. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 821/2025, registered with Police Station Umarkhed, District Yavatmal, for the offences punishable under Sections 75, 78, 351(2), 351(3), 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 12 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 3. Perusal of the case diary reveals that the applicant and the victim were having a love relationship. However, when the marriage of the victim was fixed with another person, the applicant started threatening the victim and was insisting that she must marry him. It is also seen that the applicant informed about his love relationship with the victim to the bridegroom, due to which the marriage was broken. It appears that there are no allegations of sexual intercourse. The offences of sexual harassment and stalking have been alleged. The offences alleged are punishable with upto three years. 2 60aba109.2026..odt
4. Considering the nature of allegation and punishment prescribed for the offences, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. 5. So far as the apprehension of the prosecution that the applicant will harass the victim again is concerned, that can be taken care of by imposing stringent conditions upon the applicant. Hence, following order: i) In the event of arrest, the applicant Ayyan Khan Kaisar Khan be released on bail on furnishing a P.R. bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount, in connection with Crime No. 821/2025, registered with Police Station Umarkhed, District Yavatmal, for the offence punishable under Sections 75, 78, 351(2), 351(3), 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 12 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act,
2012. ii) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station on every Tuesday and Friday, for four weeks, between 10.00 to 12.00 hrs.
iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or threaten the prosecution witnesses and shall cooperate in the investigation. iv) The applicant shall not enter in the village where the victim resides. 3 60aba109.2026..odt v) Needless to mention that, the appearance of the applicant before the Investigating Officer shall be considered as his custody under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. 6. Fees of the learned appointed counsel shall be quantified and paid as per the Rules. JUDGE Belkhede