Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 79197 (MAD)

The Executive Officer v. S Deivasigamani

WA/102/2026 · 2026-01-30

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.No.102 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.01.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.102 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.946 of 2026 The Executive Officer Sivagiri Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Sivagiri, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District - 638 109. Appellant(s) Vs 1.S.Deivasigamani S/o.Subbaraya Goundar, No.8, Annamalaikottai, Amman Koil Post, Sivagiri, Kodumudi Taluk Erode District-638109. 2.P.Baby W/o.Palanisamy, No.56/47, Vattakkalvalasu, Kilampadi Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District. 3.The District Collector Erode District, Erode - 11. ______________ p. 2 W.A.No.102 of 2026 4.The District Revenue Officer Erode District, Erode – 11. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer Erode Division, Erode District – 2. 6.The Tahsildar Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District-638 151. 7.The Revenue Inspector Sivagiri Firka, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District – 638109. 8.The Village Administrative Officer Sivagiri A.Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District - 638 109. 9.The Sub Inspector of Police Sivagiri Police Station, Erode District - 638 109. Respondent(s) PRAYER : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.36335 of 2025, dated 14.10.2025. For Appellant(s): Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar for Mr. V.Manoharan For Respondent(s):Mr. E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government Pleader for R3 to R8 Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R9 ______________ p. 3 W.A.No.102 of 2026 JUDGMENT (Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The order passed by the learned Single Judge is based on the entries made in the relevant revenue records. The place where the burial was taking place is recorded as “Odai Poramboke”. 3. In view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Jagadheeswari and 4 others v. B.Babu Naidu and 6 others1, the directions issued by the learned Single Judge to exhume the buried bodies and re-inter the same at the notified burial place does not warrant any interference. Writ appeal is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim application stands closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 30.01.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi 1AIR 2023 Mad 260 (FB) ______________ p. 4 W.A.No.102 of 2026 To: 1.The District Collector Erode District, Erode - 11 2.The District Revenue Officer Erode District, Erode - 11 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Erode Division, Erode District - 2 4.The Tahsildar Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District 638 151 5.The Revenue Inspector Sivagiri Firka, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District - 638109 6.The Village Administrative Officer Sivagiri A.Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District 638 109 7.The Sub Inspector of Police Sivagiri Police Station, Erode District 638 109 ______________ p. 5 W.A.No.102 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) W.A.No.102 of 2026 30.01.2026 ______________