Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010065702026 2026:GAU-AS:8277 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1178/2026 BABUL UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O- LATE BABUR ALI MAZUMDER,and LATE AYESHA BEGUM MAZUMDER, R/O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PART-III PARGONA BARAKPAR, P.O AND P.S - SILCHAR, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM. 2: SHIBAJUL HAQUE MAZUMDER S/O- LATE AFTAB UDDIN MAZUMDER and LATE AYESHA BEGUM MAZUMDER R/O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PART-III PARGONA BARAKPAR P.O AND P.S - SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. BEING REPRESENTED BY PETITIONER NO. 1 ON THE BASIS OF POWER OF ATTORNE VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER I/C LAND ACQUISITION BRANCH CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM. 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SILCHAR Page No.# 2/4 SADAR 5:JAKIR HUSSAIN MAZUMDER S/O LATE MAKBUL ALI MAZUMDER R/O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PART-III PARGONA - BARAKPAR P.O AND P.S- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 6:SAKIR HUSSAIN MAZUMDER S/O LATE MAKBUL ALI MAZUMDER R/O- UTTAR KRISHNAPUR PART-III PARGONA - BARAKPAR P.O AND P.S- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.P. Choudhury, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. G. Bokolial, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. Mr. G. Bokolial, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants Page No.# 3/4 submitted that an inadvertent mistake was committed while drafting the writ petition inasmuch as the names of the fathers of the petitioners were incorrectly mentioned. The learned counsel submitted that the father of the petitioner No. 1 ought to have been laid as Late Babur Ali Mazumder, whereas the father of the petitioner No. 2 ought to have been laid as Late Aftab Uddin Mazumder. The learned counsel further submitted that the applicants should not be made to suffer on account of an mistake committed by the counsel and, therefore, submitted that the said mistake be permitted to be rectified. 3. Considering the fact that it is a settled principle of law that the parties should not suffer on account of a mistake committed by the counsel, this Court permits the applicants to file a fresh amended Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court with the correct names of their respective fathers. 4. The Registry on the basis of the fresh amended Memo of Parties as well as the present order shall make necessary corrections in the cause title of WP(C) No. 886/2026 and update the same in the CIS. 5. On the basis of the corrected cause title, the Registry is further directed to issue a certified copy of the order dated 18.02.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 886/2026, subject to payment Page No.# 4/4 of costs. 6. With the above, I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant