DALJINDER SINGH JANDU v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS
CWP/11837/2026 · 2026-04-21
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7918 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7918 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
130
CWP-11837-2026 Date of Decision: 21.04.2026
DALJINDER SINGH JANDU ...Petitioner Vs.
PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Anupam Kakkar, Advocate for
Mr. Shivang Berry, Advocate
for respondent No.1-PSPCL
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to respondent-authorities to alter or insulate the overhead 11KV electricity line passing through his property. He is also seeking setting aside of order dated 19.12.2024 whereby Assistant Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited dismissed his application under Regulation 65 of Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to safety and electric supply) Regulations, 2023 (for short “CEA Regulations, 2023”).
2.
This is second round of litigation. The petitioner on earlier occasion approached this Court by way of CWP-24892-2024 which was DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.21 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-11837-2026
-2-
disposed of with direction to respondent-authority to decide his application dated 02.07.2024. Assistant Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited vide order dated 19.12.2024 observed that as per Regulation 65 of CEA Regulations, 2023 petitioner is liable to pay expenditure to be incurred to alter overhead electricity line.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner has alternative remedy to approach Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum. He may further approach Electricity Ombudsman as per Section 42(6) of Electricity Act, 2003.
4.
Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition and seeks liberty to approach aforesaid Forum.
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of. The Court is sanguine that authorities would act promptly if petitioner moves representation.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE April 21, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.21 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document