Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7918 (KAR)

SRINIVAS C @ KENCHABYRE GOWDA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY

WP/6825/2026 · 2026-03-23

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6825 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRINIVAS C @ KENCHABYRE GOWDA S/O LATE MR. CHIKKA HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. S-1215 D NO.F-107, AMRUTH MAHAL BHARATNAGARA 2ND STAGE BEL LAYOUT, MAGADI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560091 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. SRINIVAS [PARTY-IN-PERSON]) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, KUNIGAL NH-207 (HOSAKOTE-DABASPETE SECTION) SITE OFFICE AT NELAMANGALA BENGALURU NOW AT DABASPEPTE, PIN-562 111 2. RAMAKKA W/O MR LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. SRIDHAR S/O MR. LATE GOVINDAPPA Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 4. SHEELA D/O MR. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 5. RAJU R.B S/O MR. LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 6. NALINA R D/O MR. RAJU R.B AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 7. NAVEEN R S/O MR. RAJU R.B AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 8. MANJUNATH S/O LATE MRS. RANGAMMA AND MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 8 ARE ALL RESIDENT OF RAMESHWARA VILLAGE DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-561 204 9. ANUSUYA GOWDA W/O RAVISHANKAR GOWDA D/O LATE MRS. BYLAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.27, 9TH B MAIN 12TH CROSS, RAJAJINAGARA 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560 010 10. RADHA D/O LATE MRS. BYLAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 RESIDING AT NO.27, 9TH B MAIN 12TH CROSS, RAJAJINAGARA 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560 010 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-A DATED 28.11.2025 PASSED IN MISC NO. 10062/2021 BY THE HON’BLE IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT DODDABALLAPURA AND PLEASE TO ALLOW THE IA NO. VIII VIDE ANNEXURE-AK FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN MISC NO. 10062/2021 UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC 1908 FOR DELETION OF RESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 3 TO 8 AS THEY ARE NOT PROPER AND NECESSARY PARTIES AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, though the petitioner (party-in- person) has called in question the order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Doddaballapur, Bengaluru Rural District in Misc. No.10062/2021, the petitioner now confines his request to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the said miscellaneous petition expeditiously. 2. In this regard, the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the other prayers made in this writ petition. The said submission is placed on record. 3. The petitioner herein claims to be the absolute owner of land bearing Sy.No.135/5 measuring 1 acre 06 guntas and Sy.No.136/1 measuring 2 acres 14.08 guntas, situated at Naranahalli Village, Doddabelavangala Hobli, Doddaballapur Taluk. The said lands have been acquired by the National Highways Authority of India (for short, “NHAI”). Owing to disputes regarding title and apportionment of compensation, and as rival claims were made for release of the compensation amount, the competent authority under Section 3-H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, referred the matter to the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Doddaballapur. The matter is pending since the year 2021. It is the specific - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 allegation of the petitioner that the respondent is prolonging the proceedings on one pretext or another. Hence, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Misc.No.10062/2021. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the said miscellaneous petition expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the following order is passed: ORDER a) The writ petition is disposed of. b) The Trial Court, i.e., IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Doddaballapura, Bangalore Rural District, is hereby directed to dispose of Misc.No.10062/2021 in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, not later than - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16195 WP No. 6825 of 2026 three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. c) Parties are directed to co-operate for early disposal of the matter. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17