Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7918 (AP)

SRI PARAMESWARA HIGH SCHOOL v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/2971/2024 · 2026-08-12

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010052312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2971/2024 Between: 1. SRI PARAMESWARA HIGH SCHOOL, RAMARAJU PALLI, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA DISTRICT. REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT K.PRAMESWARA REDDY S/O NAGI REDDY,AGED 66 YEARS,RAMARAJUPALLI VILLAGE. BUILT- UP, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THORUGH REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION , ESI HOSPITAL ROAD, GUNNADALA,VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AUTHORIZED OFFICER, EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CORPRORATION, D.NO.6-1- 77/A,VARADARAJA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 3. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, TIRUPATI, D.NO. 1-1-77/A,VARADARAJA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in 2 issuing the impugned show cause Notice No. 79000306540001302, dated 5-1-2024 for payment of Rs.24,18,538, under Rule 73(1) of Second Schedule of Income Tax Act 1961 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principals of natural justice and violations of Article 14 , 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings No. 79000306540001302, dated 10-1-2024 issued under the ESI Act 1948 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 3rd respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 22-1-2024 pending disposal of the main W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SANGAN NAIDU 2. O UDAYA KUMAR (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 13th August, 2026 RKS