Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7915 (CHH)

OBED KUMAR MEHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/730/2020 · 2026-01-13

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2150-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 730 of 2020 Obed Kumar Mehar S/o Tikeshwar Mehar Aged About 31 Years R/o Village And Police Station Bhasma, District Sundergarh, Odisha --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Arjit Rai S/o Shri A.K. Rai, aged about 37 years, R/o Dhan Mandi Road, Torwa, Police Station Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14/01/2026 1. Heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The petitioner has 昀椀led this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 496/2018 2 (wrongly mentioned as 496/2019 in the 昀椀nal report) registered by the Police Station, Torwa, District Bilaspur, for the o昀昀ences under Sections 420, 468, 120-B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66-C and 66-D of the I.t. Act. 3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. 4. From perusal of the order sheets, it transpires that no interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner in the present case. 5. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 21.05.2020, a learned Single Judge of this Court had directed to list this matter alongwith Cr.M.P. No.715/2020, 昀椀led by the petitioner herein. Perusal of the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by a co-ordinate Bench in Cr.M.P. No. 715/2020 goes to show that the said petition was dismissed as having become infructous on the ground that a compromise had been arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter and the same has become infructuous due to e昀툀ux of time. 7. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.01.15 12:03:03 +0530