Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 79141 (MAD)

Tata Capital Ltd v. R Sujatha

Arb Appln/1634/2025 · 2026-01-12

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 Tata Capital Limited, by its Associate Legal Remedial, R. Kamalakannan, having its office at 1st Floor, Centennial Square, 6A-Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024 .... Applicant Vs. R. Sujatha V4 DIGITAL PRESS 2 47 TAYLOR ESTATE 2ND STREET, KODAMBAKKAM, V4 DIGITAL PRESS CHENNAI, PIN CODE 600 024 TAMIL NADU ..... Respondent Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w Section 9 (ii) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint a receiver namely Mr.R. Kamalakannan, employee currently designated as Legal Manager in the Applicant company having his office at First Floor, Centennial Square, Dr. Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset Excavator REVOTRONXZA bearing Engine No.REVTRNO8CYXK30378, Chassis No. MAT629527MKC24002, Regn.No.TN11AU8911, situated at V4, Digital Press, 2 47 Taylor Estate, 2nd Street, Kodambakkam, V4 Digital Press, Chennai 600 024, Tamil Nadu, or wherever it is found more fully described in the judges summons with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 For Applicant : Mr. N.K. Vanan ***** ORDER This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for brevity 'the Act'] for appointment of a receiver to seize and deliver the Construction Equipment to the applicant, if required, with police aid. 2. The applicant extended financial facilities to the respondents. Since the respondents committed default, a recall notice dated 05.04.2025 was issued and in spite of receipt of the same, there was no response from respondent. It is under these circumstances, the present petition came to be filed before this Court. 3. When the application came up for hearing on 01.12.2025 this Court issued notice to respondent. 4. Private notice has been served on the respondent and affidavit of service has also been filed. The names of respondent has also been printed in the cause list. However, the respondent is neither present nor represented through counsel. Hence, the apprehension raised on the side 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the Construction Equipment is prima facie established. 5. In view of the above, Mr.R. Kamalakannan, Associate Legal Remedial is appointed as the Court receiver and the Court receiver is permitted to seize the Construction Equipment from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required with police assistance. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 12.01.2026 msr N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. msr 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 Arbitration Application No.1634 of 2025 12.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis