Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:4361
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2700 of 2023 Mithun Banerjee S/o R.K. Banerjee Aged About 37 Years R/o C-3 Ground Floor, Anmol Flat, Avanti Vihar, Police Station Khamhardih, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station
Basantpur,
District-
Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh. 2 - Archana Jha D/o Virendra Jha Aged About 30 Years R/o Gali No.1, Shanti Nagar Ward No.10, Near Chikhli School, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Maya Chaturvisani, Advocate For Respondent No.1-State : Mr.Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
27 .01
.2026
1. Heard Ms.Maya Chaturvisani, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State. BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.01.27 17:08:59 +0530
2
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to file the final charge- sheet against the respondent No.2/accused in FIR No. 256/2023 registered by the police of Police Station Basantpur, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) within the period of 15 days, in the interest of justice. ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 for proper investigation and file proper charge-sheet under the proper sections of Indian Penal Code, because the respondent No.2/accused dishonestly induced the property, therefore, the Section 420 of IPC is also made out against the respondent No.2/accused, in the interest of justice.”
3. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State submits that in the present case, investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted in the Court concerned, to which
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the charge-sheet, if the matter survives. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu