COCP-2128 IN THE HI 116 Piara Singh Manju CORAM: Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in C Magistrate- whereby th observations 2128-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Singh Versus HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. RS Sanga, Advocate for the I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 29.04.2025 (Annex CWP-21995-2023, titled as ‘M -cum-Appellate Tribunal, Dist by the writ petition was dispose ations:- “xxx xxx 3. Learned counsel appeari submits that the said condition acceptable to the petitioner petitioner submits that the vac will be given on 1st November, their occupation and residence. 4. Keeping in view the abov settled their dispute, in terms been mentioned hereinabove an the respective parties before the disposed of in terms of the ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2128-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA for the petitioner. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Manju vs. Additional District District Amritsar and others’ disposed of with the following xxx earing on behalf of the petitioner ition put by the senior citizens, is oner. Learned counsel for the vacant possession of the house ber, 2025 to the senior citizens for nce. above, as the parties have already rms of the condition, which have e and have been acknowledged by e the Court, the present petition is the said settlement between the ging Writ trict ing er is he se or dy ve by is he RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2128 2. compliance directed in p the vacant p However, th tenants whic the suit prop 3. compliance 29.04.2025 question, th petitioner. 4. 5. the petitione order dated letter and sp is interfering 2128-2026 -2- parties. The parties will not get but will be bound by the settlement which have been arri 5. Till the property is vacat keep on paying a sum of Rs.5,0 after the possession of prope petitioner to the senior citizens will not be given by the petitio citizens.” It is submitted by learned coun iance of the Writ Court order dated in para No. 3 reproduced above, th cant possession of the suit house to ver, the respondent has rented out th which interferes in the peaceful pos it property. It is also admitted by learned co iance of direction contained in para 2025 (Annexure P-5), till the date the respondent had been paying Heard. From the submissions made on titioner, it is clear that the explicit dire dated 29.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) ha and spirit. There is nothing on record rfering in peaceful possession of the p t get the impugned order executed the above-mentioned amicable arrived at between them. acated by the petitioner, they will s.5,000/- to the senior citizens but roperty is handed over by the zens, the said financial assistance etitioner any further to the senior d counsel for the petitioner that in ated 29.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) as ve, the respondent has handed over to the petitioner on 01.11.2025. out the next door house to certain ul possession of the petitioner over ned counsel for the petitioner that in in para No. 5 of the order dated date of vacation of the house in paying a sum of ₹5000/- to the ade on behalf of learned counsel for cit directions of the Writ Court vide have been complied with in its ecord to suggest that the respondent f the petitioner over the suit house. ed le ill ut he ce or in as 025. rtain over in ated e in the l for vide n its dent . RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2128 As such, no and the same 6. 7. 04.05.2026 rishu 2128-2026 -3- ch, no further order is required to be e same stands dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable to be passed in the instant petition; any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.