2026:HHC:3897 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 340 of 2026 Decided on : 24.02.2026 Sh. Ramu …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served in case the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation with further direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:3897 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a detailed representation, with regard to the issues raised in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, let the same be decided by the Authority concerned, within a period of 12 weeks’ as from the date of receipt thereof and in terms of the averments contained therein, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 24, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)