[2026:RJ-JP:21873] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7985/2026 1. Meghraj S/o Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Sangrampura Police Station Newai District Tonk. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Tonk). 2. Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Ramdhan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Kotiya Ki Dhani Mundiya Police Station Newai District Tonk. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda Mr. Naman Gurjar For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Kunal Rawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/05/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.126/2026 registered at Police Station Newai, District Tonk for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), 303(2), 351(2) and 333 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that they committed house trespass by entering in the shop of complainant- Rakesh and inflicted injuries to complainant-Rakesh and his father [2026:RJ-JP:21873] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7985/2026] Sitaram. He further submits that, as per the medical opinion, the injuries sustained by injured Rakesh and his father Sitaram have been opined to be simple in nature. The petitioners are behind bars since 06.05.2026. Though one criminal antecedent against petitioner Meghraj and two criminal antecedents against petitioner Surendra have been reported, in all such cases they have already been enlarged on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Meghraj S/o Shri Ramnarayan and Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Ramdhan, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 80/Arun