Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7903 (AP)

B. Radha Krshna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22404/2026 · 2026-08-10

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010415882026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22404 OF 2026 Between: 1. B. Radha Krishna, S/o. Bontu Suryanarayana aged 71 years, Occ Cultivation R/o. 2-83, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District Andhra Pradesh - 533222 2. Kolia Tata Rao, S/o. Kolia Narayana Murthy, aged 72 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. 2-55, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. B. Bala Mohana Rao, S/o. Satyanarayana, aged 58 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. 2-59, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533222 4. B. Lakshminarayana, S/o. Bontu Chandra Rao, aged 67 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. 2-64/1, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. B. Koteswara Rao, S/o. Peda Satyanarayana, aged 60 years Occ Cultivation, R/o. 6-64, Isukapudi, Jakkamsettivari Palem, Isukapudi, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533214 6. B. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Peda Satyanarayana, aged 50 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. 2-60, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533222 2 7. Bontu Kanaka Durga, W/o. Chitti Babu, aged 45, Years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533222 8. Bontu Nagamani, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged 55 years, R/o. 2-51, Occ Cultivation, Bontuvaripalem, Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533222 9. B. Chitti Babu, S/o. Chandra Rao, aged 52 years, Occ Cuitivation, R/o. 2- 51, Bontuvaripalem Vanapallipalem, Uppalaguptam Mandal East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh -533222 ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Food and Agricultural Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Thulluri Mandal, Guntur District -522238. 2. The District Collector, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District - 533201, Amalapuram, Ambekar Konaseema District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram - 233201, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District 4. The Tahsildar, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District -533222. 5. The Additional Director, Fisheries Department Office of Commissioner of Fisheries Bundaru Road, Vijayawada - 521137 6. The District Fisheries Officer, Fisheries Department, Amalapuram- 233201, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District 7. The Fisheries Development Officer, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam- 533222, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District 3 8. Desamsetti Venkata Lakshminarayana, S/o. Veerabhadra Rao, aged not known, Occ Cultivation, R/o. Vanapalli Palem Village, Uppalaguptam Manda - 533228, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 in not restraining Respondent No. 8 and his men converting paddy agricultural lands admeasuring Ac. 4.37 cents., in Sy. No. 597/1A and 597/IB, situated in Vanapallipalem Village of Uppalaguptam Mandal, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema Distirct into Prawn Culture and carrying out the same without securing any permissions or registration from the concerned authorities as prescribed under G.O. Ms. No. 7, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries (Fish - II Department dated 16.03.2013) as illegal, arbitrary and consequently, direct Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 to ensure that no Acqua Culture / Prawn Culture is carried out by 8th respondent herein or his men in the above- mentioned land, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 2 to 7, to restrain the 8th respondent from carrying out Prawn Culture in the lands admeasuring Ac. 4.37 cents, in Sy. No. 597/1A and 597/IB, situated in Vanapallipalem Village of Uppalaguptam Mandal, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema Distirct into Prawn Culture pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: P U BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FISHERIES 4 Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fisheries appearing for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners in the instant Writ Petition is against the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 7 in restraining the respondent No.8 in operating the fish tanks constructed in the agricultural lands over an extent of Ac.4.37 cents in Sy.No.597/1A and 597/1B situated in Vanapallipalem Village of Uppalaguptam Mandal, Dr. Ambedkar Konaseema District, without having valid permission or registration under the Andhra Pradesh State Aquaculture Development Authority Act, 2020. 3. When the matter has been taken up for consideration today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fisheries has placed before the Court a copy of remarks received from the respondent No.7 in the case. From the same it would reflect that, pursuant to the objections raised by the petitioners, field inspection was conducted on 20-07-2026. During the course of said inspection, it has been come to the light that the respondent No.8 had converted the agricultural land into a fish tank without any permission. It is further stated that on account of objections of the petitioners, no permission was granted to the respondent No.8 and the same has already been communicated to the petitioners vide proceedings dated 04-07-2026. The said instructions of the respondent No.7 are placed on record. 5 4. Having regard to the same, since the grievance of the petitioners was resolved, no further adjudication is necessary in the case. 5. Having regard to the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 11-08-2026 MSI 6 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22404 OF 2026 Dated: 11-08-2026 MSI